NotePlan’s simple folder/file-based architecture make that step an obvious one.Īgenda, by contrast, started off with some impressive goals, and achieved a number of them at an early stage. I have no doubt that at some time in the near future, Eduard will add the ability to attach files and display images. The recent expansion of Apple Calendar/Reminders integration is a great step forward. What I’m particularly impressed by is the way NotePlan has made steady, sensible progress from a very simple initial premise (which I looked at a couple of years ago but wasn’t especially impressed by) to a powerful, flexible information management machine. There are other multi-component task managers that interact in similar ways, but in my experience none are as immediately and practically easy to use as NotePlan (not even the exceptional but relatively complex Pagico). The simple, user-friendly interaction of the Notes and Calendar components is outstanding. The recent advances, including nested tagging, savable filters/smart searches and rendered markdown, have made it a very attractive, very usable environment. In several senses of the word: it is fast to update, fast to sync - and also continues to make rapid progress, driven by the enthusiastic Eduard. Whereas NotePlan (speaking from my own experience, which is primarily text-based, so I’m not so interested in the ability to display images/attach files) is fast. Nice, good-looking, but confused and slow. I like your review of the two apps, Drewster, but agree above all with your conclusions about Agenda: it’s slow. I thought it might be of interest to CRIMPers here on the forum.įYI a new version of NotePlan just came out with live Markdown rendering. I recently wrote a short blog post attempting to outline the challenge faced choosing between these apps. I own both Agenda and NotePlan, across macOS and iOS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |